humorist + humanist (
erinptah) wrote in
andthatstheword2009-11-09 12:24 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Needs Met, page 05
Title: Needs Met, page 05
Rating: PG (post-coital cuddling)
Warnings (highlight for spoilers): consent issues; (skip) Sweetness
Characters/Pairings: "Stephen"/Jon, l!"Stephen"/Jon, l!"Stephen"/"Stephen"
Disclaimer: This is a work of parody. Although reference is made to real persons, the dialogue, actions, and content are products of the artist's imagination only.
Note that, while this is the morning after, there was sex under false pretenses in between. YMMV (there's some discussion of the subtleties in the comments to the last page), but dub-con at best.

Needverse!Stephen is not allowed in the kitchen due to having the attention span of a mayfly. Neededverse!Stephen, meanwhile, is an excellent cook...and too tolerant for his own good.
Also here on DA, with links to the rest.
Rating: PG (post-coital cuddling)
Warnings (highlight for spoilers): consent issues; (skip) Sweetness
Characters/Pairings: "Stephen"/Jon, l!"Stephen"/Jon, l!"Stephen"/"Stephen"
Disclaimer: This is a work of parody. Although reference is made to real persons, the dialogue, actions, and content are products of the artist's imagination only.
Note that, while this is the morning after, there was sex under false pretenses in between. YMMV (there's some discussion of the subtleties in the comments to the last page), but dub-con at best.

Needverse!Stephen is not allowed in the kitchen due to having the attention span of a mayfly. Neededverse!Stephen, meanwhile, is an excellent cook...and too tolerant for his own good.
Also here on DA, with links to the rest.
no subject
AUGH STEPHEN THE GUN SEEMS A BIT MUCH BUT OK.
no subject
no subject
One thing is bugging me though; since they were already switching sexual partners like square dancers, why didn't the Jons just ASK?
no subject
Insofar as they were thinking about this at all, they both thought "we're basically the same person, and my Stephen has never objected to anything I've done in terms of sex before, so this won't be a big deal."
no subject
But it certainly lightened me up before my interview. XD Don't worry, maybe it's uhm... a reactionary test? Maybe c!Stephen's Jon would react to Sweetness in a certain way, as opposed to someone else, and that's just the most up-front way c!Stephen can think to ask, considering his personality.
I have to hand it to Stephen, though, not many people would have incentive to lie with a gun pointed at the back of their neck. Maybe, it's a, "If you're man enough to do me, you're man enough to answer me truthfully sort of thing?"
That being said, I'm really digging the other Stephen's green robe and his convoluted way of trying not to offend Jon. I was going to say that I was waiting for the other shoe to drop, for c!Stephen to put down his gun (eventually) and think this through, but I don't think the first one has. We're barely at the admission stage.
Yay, comic and however else this all goes down! :D
no subject
L!Stephen, meanwhile, is also feeling defensive....so he overcompensates by being hyper-accommodating. Alas.
And, oh yes, there are several more shoes to come :P
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Personally, in this rare instance, I am much closer to c!Stephen's end of the spectrum.)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I'm looking at the comments here, and I suddenly feel terribly guilty for the fact that this all makes me giggle, and think of "The Parent Trap." But, y'know, for grown ups.
no subject
And, yeah, I'm trying to take a middle-of-the-road approach with this. The consent issues aren't going to be ignored, but at the same time the story started on a comedic note, so it's not going to do a full 180. Hopefully some people will be able to read it with an eye to the consent issues, and not be disappointed, while others will be able to just lol through it.
You're not the first person to mention The Parent Trap. It was one of my favorite movies when I was younger :3
no subject
I saw it coming *crosses arms and glares* you brought it on yourselves, Jons.
(Stephen? Put the gun down, honey...)
/utterly redundant comment. PS I love you :D
no subject
Thank you!
no subject
no subject
Thanks!
no subject
no subject
no subject
And, ha, I wondered how the discovery would come about:) I know this is wrong, but Stephen holding Sweetness up to Jon's head could almost be seen as a litmus test. What if c!Stephen's Jon had insisted Stephen keep her unloaded, and therefore only an impostor would fear for his life. Or something.
"Neededverse." I love it. And "chu!"
no subject
The dreamcatcher is because l!Stephen has a thing for indigenous religions and being Close To The Earth (and has not done enough research to know that dreamcatchers aren't very significant in many Native American cultures, except as useful for selling to tourists).
And, yes, it's a litmus test! Not with exactly those details, but you're on the right track =D
no subject
Every time I see dreamcatchers (or puppy slippers) I think of George:)
Right, Stephen doesn't have much respect for a gun's power, even though he insists that this one in particular is his special lady. Why not use firearms for empirical data?
no subject
Having said that, I'm still enjoying this story. Liked the eagle on the headboard.
no subject
And thanks =)
no subject
no subject