Yeah, there are more angry liberals in newspapers, Hollywood, academia, and the world in general than there are pundits on TV, so that's not really a fair comparison.
If you accept the idea that a lot of TV news is left-leaning, and that even so there are very few angry liberals on TV news, that suggests that angry liberals make up a small percentage of liberalism. Whereas, if conservatives in TV news are a minority but there are lots of angry conservative pundits, that suggests the opposite.
I do love the idea of l!Stephen having an inexplicable crush on Palin. He would be more open about it rather than being embarrassed, though. "I know she's an intolerant moral-majority non-blinker, but she's so hot! Also, her views are just as valid as anyone else's. Except maybe the bit about hunting. What did those moose ever do to her?"
(L!Stephen is a vegetarian. I should write something about that...)
no subject
If you accept the idea that a lot of TV news is left-leaning, and that even so there are very few angry liberals on TV news, that suggests that angry liberals make up a small percentage of liberalism. Whereas, if conservatives in TV news are a minority but there are lots of angry conservative pundits, that suggests the opposite.
I do love the idea of l!Stephen having an inexplicable crush on Palin. He would be more open about it rather than being embarrassed, though. "I know she's an intolerant moral-majority non-blinker, but she's so hot! Also, her views are just as valid as anyone else's. Except maybe the bit about hunting. What did those moose ever do to her?"
(L!Stephen is a vegetarian. I should write something about that...)